What the End of Globalization Means for You

Posted on 1 Comment

Globalization gets a bad rap.

Just like much of economics, globalization is a zero-sum game.What the End of Globalization Means for You

There are Winners and Losers

American manufacturing workers were losers during the recent wave of globalization. It’s blamed for massive job loss here in America as manufacturers chased cheaper labor opportunities in other parts of the globe. To be fair, however, many economists point out that technology also contributed to the loss of manufacturing jobs.

American consumers won as our purchasing power increased with access to cheap imports, which included everything from sweaters to children’s toys to most items you’d pick up on a weekend shopping trip to Wal-Mart or Target.

The U.S. economy also won with a pick-up in economic growth since 1990. (Economic theory suggests that globalization is good for the world economy and economic growth and that seems to have played out during the recent globalization wave).

The stock market benefits from globalization as it opens borders, which allows higher corporate profits.

Over the past three decades, U.S. stocks outperformed equities elsewhere, Capital Economics notes.

“That in part reflects the success of US companies in harnessing globalization to increase their earnings in foreign markets and improve their margins by outsourcing their production,” Capital Economics said.

History Shows Waves of Globalization

Looking back over the past 150 years, there have been three distinct waves of globalization.

First Wave: 1870-1913

Second Wave: After WWII until the early 1970s

Third Wave: Around the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and gained steam in the 1990s to the present.

Is the third wave ending now? Some economists say yes. And, the populist movement in America is pushing for that.

What’s at Stake

The current U.S. – China Trade war may have deeper implications for the future of global economic growth, U.S. economic growth and stock market returns.

Capital Economics released new research highlighting that “the de-globalization scenario that is most concerning is a deep split between a China- and US-led economic bloc. This could potentially lead to a permanent reduction in trend GDP growth.”

Capital Economics research shows that globalization has boosted asset returns over the past 30 years.

So, it makes sense if globalization halts that would weigh on stock market returns. Both bond and equity returns are likely to be lower over the next decade than in the recent past, Capital Economics said.

“If policymakers threw up major barriers to trade and sought to undo a significant part of global economic and financial integration, the absolute real returns from most assets would suffer and equities and industrial commodities would probably under-perform safe assets, such as high-grade government bonds and gold,” Capital Economics said.

The Bottom Line

The U.S. China Trade war encompasses many issues that are far-reaching to our future.

“If we are right that the trade war reflects China’s strategic threat to the US, then some form of decoupling is inevitable – which will have an adverse effect on global GDP.”

A major shift in the world economic order is underway. East is rising up against West. A breakdown of cooperation could have an impact on your portfolio and your wealth. Safe assets like gold are expected to outperform as the current wave of globalization comes to an end. Do you own enough?

Get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly. Sign up for our newsletter!

1 thought on “What the End of Globalization Means for You

  1. Could you comment on the stories about the Chinese covering up the true amount of gold holdings and possible Government backed Crypto- currency to be backed by this? Seems to have some weight and my sister-in-law is Han Chinese and told me over 35 years ago China would dominate the global economy. It looks like the US can only slow it’s rise down some at best even though all our corporations are shifting operations there. HW Bush was their “best friend” having lived there with Barbara 1973-74. I remember when the British Empire withered away and the Pound lost about 4/5ths of it’s value when I lived in Canberra, ACT around 1959. I also worked in Sao Paulo, Brazil working at GM when the Cruziero and Cruzado inflated away to nothing at rates sometimes over 1,000% daily.

Comments are closed.