How Early Commerce Started with Mormon Gold

Posted on

Many people believe the U.S. government was the first organization to mint gold mined in California. In truth, this historical touchstone belongs to Salt Lake City, Utah.

The origin of this story, however, does not begin in Salt Lake City. Instead, it starts in San Diego during the Mexican-American War. This was the destination of the Mormon Battalion. During their march some members of the battalion traveled north and eventually started working for James Marshall at Sutter’s Mill in Coloma, California. During this period the Mormon Battalion members assisted Marshall in discovering gold in early 1848. This find is part of what sparked the California Gold rush.

In time the Mormon Battalion founded their own mining town called Mormon Island. The location proved to be valuable leading to more gold discoveries.

In time, LDS president Brigham Young, and other officials John Taylor, and John Kay began work on dies to be used in the minting of the gold. By the end of 1848 Mormon members had their first gold coins. These original pieces had the words “Pure Gold” printed on one side and “Holiness of the Lord” on the other.

Eventually, the words “Pure Gold” were replaced with “S.L.C.P.G.” which is an abbreviation for Salt Lake City Pure Gold. These first coins included an image of a Phrygian cap which resembled the design of early coins minted by the US government. Below the cap was a design of the “eye of Jehovah” and a picture of hands shaking which symbolized friendship.

These designs changed over time. In 1860, Mormons minted pieces using gold sourced in Colorado. These coins included images of a lion and a beehive. Part of the reason for these new designs was to help territorial gold collectors identify them as belonging to a different sub type.

There were a total of six different coin designs. The first pieces minted in 1848 were $10 coins and were notated with a 1849 mint year. Other coins with this year were of $2.50, $5, and $20 values.

Other versions were minted in 1850 and 1860. The total number of minted coins was low, estimated to be approximately 4,000 pieces.

By 1861, Utah territory governor Alfred Cumming put an end to the minting of Mormon coins. People quickly found the coins to be wanting, as their weights were often below-grade. The $5.00 coin was estimated to hold only $4.30 in gold. These coins were thus accepted in trade at a discount and many fell victim to the melting pot.

These early coins have given credence to the argument that Brigham Young was a crucial part of developing the coin system that came to define commerce in the early days of the U.S.  It is likely that these coins helped spark trade among the early territories and therefore accelerated the development of the country.

These pieces remain rare and are often sought after by collectors. They represent a pioneer spirit, industriousness, and the enduring power of friendship.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

The Star of Any Collection

Posted on

In the 1870’s, several nations began advocating for the creation of a universal coin that could be used in international trade. The idea gained traction in 1879.

$4 Stella coin reverse.$4 Stella coin obverse.That year, John A. Kasson, the U.S. envoy to Austria-Hungary proposed a U.S. $4 gold coin, which would state its metallic content in the metric system to make it simpler for Europeans to use. The proposed $4 coin would roughly equate to the value of the Spanish 20-peseta, the Italian 20-lire and the British sovereign.

This new coin could facilitate international trade and travel for U.S. citizens, its proponents argued.

Today, that $4 gold coin is reverently known as the Stella and the stories around this coin abound. How did it get its name? The Latin word for star is Stella and the coin features a five-pointed star on its reverse.

This ultra-rarity is beyond the reach of most collectors. Demand for these iconic coins far outstrips supply. On the rare occasions they surface for sale it’s typically from a time-honored, monumental collection of historic U.S. coins. Yet, these pattern coins never were created for circulation. The story continues…

Kassen’s idea intrigued members of Congress and they authorized the U.S. Mint to produce a small run of the $4 gold coins so that Congressman could review them and consider the proposal.

Two obverse designs were produced for the $4 gold piece. Chief Engraver Charles Barber created a design that featured a portrait of Liberty facing left with long, flowing hair on the obverse, known today as the Flowing Hair type. George T. Morgan, the creator of the famous Morgan silver dollars, developed the Coiled Hair type. The reverse of the $4 Stella reveals the motto DEO EST GLORIA, which translates into “God is Glorious.”

These coins are scarce. It is estimated that a mere 425 Flowing Hair coins were minted in 1879, with only 12 known Coiled Hair types from 1879. In 1880, there are only 17 known Flowing Hair types and 8 Coiled Hair.

While the quest for an international coin failed and none of these pattern coins ever became a regular issue, collectors then and for generations have coveted these illustrious and historic coins.

Even then, demand was high for these awe-inspiring coins. Yet, there were also scandals. After the limited run was produced, rumors surrounded the highly sought after Stellas. While it was said that no coin collector could obtain a Stella from the U.S. Mint, the Congressmen who had received the special order apparently used them as gifts and perhaps even payment. It was said that these great works of numismatic art were seen in special necklaces adorning the bosoms of Washington’s top madams, whose brothels were said to be patronized by those same Congressmen.

These coins were produced just over 100 years after America gained its independence to England. Our nation’s economy was growing rapidly and part of America’s historic Gilded Age. Wealthy industrialists and businessmen like John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan and Cornelius Vanderbilt built storied empires and also contributed greatly to society through their philanthropy. The $4 Stella is a historic gem from this exciting time in American history.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

Biden’s Billionaire Tax Aimed at More than Just Billionaires

Posted on 1 Comment

If you are a successful entrepreneur, small business owner or a high net worth individual who has accumulated wealth through your innovation, hard work and smart investing, the government is coming for you.

The Biden administration rolled out a major tax reform proposal last week called the “Billionaire Minimum Income Tax.” This aggressive proposal would result in a huge tax hit on America’s high-net worth households if enacted, and it’s not just the billionaires who would feel the pain.

When you look at the details of this new tax championed by progressives – it turns out most of the people impacted are multi-millionaires. This extraordinary tax proposal attempts to redefine “wealth” and “income” and ultimately is a new form of taxation on the rich.

New tax proposals like this offer a reminder to all Americans that there are discreet and private methods to protect your wealth through investments in tangible assets like rare coins and bullion. These private precious metals assets can be stored in your home safe, a bank safety deposit box or even outside our country’s borders at a facility like the International Depository Services (IDS) of Canada, a precious metals depository in Toronto. Assets are stored here in an international personal custody account, which is off depository balance sheets and beyond the reach of the U.S. government. But, we’ll discuss this more later…

First…here’s how this new wealth tax would work.

The 20% minimum tax rate would apply to both your ordinary income and the increase of the value of your assets over the past year.

This is an entirely new structure of taxation that taxes your unrealized capital gains.

In today’s tax code, you aren’t taxed until assets are sold and you realize that income. You don’t pay taxes when an asset increases in value! This new tax proposal stretches the actual definition of wealth – and calls “unrealized gains” your income.

Under this new tax scheme, taxpayers would be required to report their assets to the IRS annually. Assets you own would be valued at their market value and that’s the amount you would owe taxes on.

It’s not just stock portfolios, this proposal would include assets including your businesses and real estate holdings. The market value of these non-tradeable assets would be calculated by a “conservative floating annual return” calculated by the five-year Treasury rate plus 2 percentage points.

What about losses in future years? It’s not clear in the current proposal if losses in future years would offset annual gains.

Here’s an example of what that could mean. Perhaps a high-net worth individual might have to pay a $2 million tax on an unrealized gain in 2022 of $10 million. But, then if the assets declined by $10 million in 2023, you are out of luck. The government has their take. You’ve paid taxes on an unrealized gain, which has now disappeared into thin air.

For now, the proposed tax will only apply to households with a net worth of $100 million or more.

Beware, these new taxes always start out applying to a few and then spread wider to impact more and more Americans in other brackets of wealth or income.

This proposed wealth tax has been put forth as a brand new revenue stream that would bring in roughly $360 billion over 10 years.

Gold is an excellent vehicle for the private preservation of wealth.

The tax tide is turning and the government is looking for more ways to tax wealthy Americans. If these proposals become law it is valuable to understand how it will affect you and why it could be useful to increase your allocation to gold and rare coins now before the tax plan passes.

Fortunately, there is time for you to diversify your wealth to get in front of these proposed tax changes to protect your assets.

Gold bullion and rare coins have long been touted by trust attorneys as an efficient and discreet method of transferring wealth from one generation to another. These tax proposals would significantly reduce the wealth you can give to your heirs – as the government will take a much larger portion of you and your family’s money with this unrealized capital gains tax.

If you or your family could be impacted by the proposed shift in the tax law, don’t wait. Contact a Blanchard portfolio manager for a confidential portfolio review – and to learn strategies to protect and preserve your wealth. Read more about options for storing your tangible assets here.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

Press Release: Blanchard Built Zito Family Collection Results in two auction records being shattered!

Posted on

NEW ORLEANS, LA, April 6, 2022 – Blanchard and Company, the nation’s leading tangible asset firm, made numismatic history again following this week’s public auction of the1907 Indian Eagle obverse in slab casing Zito family collection.

Included were two 1907 $10 Indian pieces that shattered previous auction records.  These coins, an NGC MS68 1907 $10 Indian Wire Edge and a CAC PCGS MS67 1907 Rolled Edge, both sold at nearly double their previous record highs.

Over an eight-year period, Blanchard advised the late Dr. Paul Zito, a medical doctor from New York, and his wife Rosalie. Through Blanchard’s deep numismatic connections, the firm sourced for them a historic collection of 92 U.S. gold and silver coins.

This week, 89 lots from their collection were presented at public auction and sold for over $4.3 million. Blanchard helped the Zito family to achieve their goal to diversify their portfolio with a collection of high-quality and ultra-rare tangible assets.

Investors quickly bid on the rare U.S. gold and silver coins once they became available and the entire collection sold immediately. “This underscores the high demand and limited supply for ultra-rare numismatics in today’s environment with inflation at 40-year highs, expansive monetary policies and a slowing U.S. economy,” said David Zanca, Senior Portfolio Manager at Blanchard, who worked with the Zito family over 8 years to build this fabulous collection.

The start of the current boom in rare coin demand can be traced to the beginning of the pandemic in 2020, which triggered a renewed interest in tangible assets, including rare coins. Both the number of sales of rare coins and the prices paid for rarities exploded higher over the past two years industry wide.

The NGC MS68 1907 $10 Indian Wire Edge is tied with one other at MS68.  Interestingly, the other MS68 is the Steinbrenner coin, also placed by Zanca. Until the Zito piece was placed last evening, the Steinbrenner coin held the auction record, having sold in August 2019 for $432,000.  Now, not even three years later, the Zito piece set a new record having sold at nearly double the prior record at $840,000.

One lot later, the CAC PCGS MS67 1907 $10 Indian Rolled Edge made its own bit of history by shattering its previous record price. The Zito piece is tied with the Pogue coin as the finest known within the CAC population.  Just two years ago the Pogue coin was placed at $576,000.  The Zito piece blasted past that number and settled at $1,140,000.

“It’s incredibly satisfying to see the results for these long-term clients.  Seeing the Steinbrenner Wire Edge break the record at $425,000 in 2019 was amazing.  Now, not even three years later to see another of my clients’ pieces nearly double that record is a testament to what is happening in the rare coin market.  As to the Rolled Edge, seeing a client realize well over $1 million for a coin is just wonderful.  It proves that if an investor acquires quality and sticks with a plan that, literally, world records can be broken.”

Other outstanding coins sourced by Blanchard from the Zito collection include:

  • 1795 Draped Bust Silver Dollar. BB-52, B-15. Rarity-8 as a Specimen. Centered Bust. Specimen-65
  • 1799 Draped Bust Silver Dollar. BB-163, B-10. Rarity-2. MS-63 (NGC). OH.
  • 1832 Capped Head Left Quarter Eagle. BD-1, the only known dies. Rarity-4. MS-63 (NGC).
  • 1863 Three-Dollar Gold Piece. JD-1, the only known dies. Rarity-6+. Proof-64 Cameo (NGC). CAC.
  • 1799 Capped Bust Right Half Eagle. BD-6. Rarity-5. Small Reverse Stars. MS-63 (NGC).
  • 1872 Liberty Head Eagle. MS-64 (PCGS). OGH.

The Blanchard sourced collection highlights the firm’s unmatched ability to secure the best rarities for its clients.  “Since 1975, Blanchard & Co. has been the premier rare coin dealer in the country. With a specialty in legacy coins, our firm has placed more significant numismatic coins than anyone in the industry,” Zanca said.

Despite the tight numismatic market supply in 2022, Blanchard has been very successful in unearthing several private holdings. Blanchard recently placed two flagship rarities, including the 1794 Flowing Hair Dollar and the 1808 $2½ Capped Bust. Given the tiny mintages and the concentration of wealth in the United States in that era, these hallmark coins could very well have been owned by one of the American Greats of that time.

“We continue to have incredible reach within the numismatic community and can almost always find whatever you are looking for even in the current extremely tight market conditions,” Zanca said.

About Blanchard

Founded in 1975, Blanchard is the largest and most respected investment firm in the U.S. that specializes in precious metals and rare coins. Headquartered in New Orleans, Blanchard has owned and sold more than half of the published 100 Greatest U.S. Coins with over $1.3 billion in sales in the last four years alone. With over 520,000 customers to date, Blanchard has provided investors and collectors with the expert consultation they need to strategically acquire American numismatic rarities and gold, silver, platinum and palladium bullion.

David Zanca is a 28-year veteran of the precious metals industry and senior portfolio manager at Blanchard. He can be reached at 1-800-880-4653.

MEDIA CONTACT:

Sarah Munson

1-800-880-4653

[email protected]

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

Why a Movie Theatre Chain Bought a Gold and Silver Mine

Posted on

In mid-March, the movie theater chain AMC announced their agreement to buy a stake in Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.

Image of the inside of a gold mine.

AMC will spend $27.9 million for a 22% stake. The investment offers much-needed support for the mining operation which is struggling financially. Hycroft owns a mine in Northern Nevada and is aiming to raise cash by selling shares. Their goal is to generate $500 million.

In recent months, AMC has seen a dramatic improvement in their financial standing as a result of their meme stock status. The stock surged more than 1,000% in 2021 giving the beleaguered chain a boost. This windfall has allowed the company to become more aggressive in their investments.

The question is: why buy shares in a mining company?

While there doesn’t seem to be any definitive answer there are some theories. Some suggest that the investment is a way for AMC to diversify their business. This move may be in response to the continued popularity of streaming entertainment. Additionally, the occasional resurgence of COVID variants has repeatedly kept audiences away from theaters.

Another reason for the deal might be the relationship between Jason Mudrick and AMC CEO Adam Aron. Mudrick – who brought Hycroft public in 2020 – was instrumental in helping AMC escape bankruptcy in 2021 by advising them to initiate an at-the-market share offering. The move helped AMC fully capitalize on their rocketing share price.

The money Hycroft raised from AMC and the money they hope to raise from others might be used to purchase new technology that can more effectively process their reserves. The viability of this plan remains to be seen.

Aron believes that the deal is a wise move for AMC because Hycroft holds “rock-solid assets” and simply needs to overcome liquidity problems to reach profitability. Aron has also indicated that he believes the deal might encourage more investors to purchase Hycroft shares.

Newly raised capital could be the shot in the arm Hycroft needs to realize the full value of their operation. The mining company is focused on gold and silver deposits in Northern Nevada. Their long-term plan is to grow into a large-scale mining operation by redesigning their process for sulfide gold and silver resources.

Immediately following the announcement of the AMC deal investors appeared enthusiastic. Hycroft shares closed approximately 9% higher after the deal was made public.

The rise might also signal a renewed interest among investors in precious metals. As geopolitical tensions continue to rise amid the Ukraine-Russia war more investors are considering of assets that might be more likely to hold their value as global markets waiver. For these investors, purchasing physical gold likely makes the most sense. However, investor appetite for gold and silver has surged enough to reignite interest in mines as well. AMC and Hycroft appear well positioned to benefit from investors’ search for stability in uncertain times.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

Look What Happened When the Fed Threw Out Its Play Book

Posted on

Prior to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, the Federal Reserve board relied upon a little known but useful guideline that economists called “The Taylor Rule.”

the headquarters of Federal reserve bank in Washington DC, USA.

We thought it was time to dust off the Taylor Rule, shine some light on what it says – and also discuss what’s happened since the Fed abandoned its previously useful guideline.

First, what is the Taylor Rule? Stanford University professor John Taylor introduced this formula in 1993 which prescribes a certain level of Federal Reserve interest rate based on the rate of inflation and how strong the economy is growing. This mathematical formula delivers an exact level of where the Fed’s benchmark interest rate should be.

As you may be aware, the Fed’s benchmark interest rate remains extremely low by historical standards. Yes, the Fed did notch up its rate by a quarter point recently – but it still stands at a paltry 0.25-0.50%.

The fact that the Federal Reserve has stood idly by over the past six months while inflation crept higher and higher – to a now 40-year high – probably has former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker turning over in his grave.

Mr. Volcker was widely known for his success as Fed Chairman waging a successful war to end the high levels of inflation seen in the U.S. during the late 1970’s and early 1980’s.

So, where does the Taylor Rule say the Fed’s benchmark interest rate should be now?

The Fed’s interest rate should be over 5.0%, not below 1%! It’s like the Fed has been asleep at the wheel.

Not only that, in the past 14 years since U.S. central bankers threw out their playbook, the size of the U.S. balance sheet has exploded to a record high now standing at $8.9 trillion – with a “t” U.S. dollars. Before the 2008 crisis, the Fed’s balance sheet was around $870 billion. It’s no wonder inflation has skyrocketed. The U.S. government has been printing money like no time before in history and the Fed has been sitting on its hands when it comes to interest rates.

Precious Metals: A Safe Haven in These Unpredictable Times

When you can’t count on the Fed to follow predictable rules, individual investors must take the financial future into their own hands.

Precious metals have climbed in value this year as investors big and small turn to gold and silver to protect and hedge their wealth. The inflation genie has been let out of the bottle. The Fed knew better, but they still failed to act faster. When it comes to your money and your financial future, it’s never been more important to make decisions that will protect your hard earned money. Do you own enough gold?

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

What is the “S.3771 – Stop Russian GOLD Act of 2022”?

Posted on

In early March a U.S. bill was introduced in an attempt to restrict Russia from selling their gold. The bill was a collaborative effort from a bipartisan group of senators.

A pile of Russian gold coins.

The bill has far-reaching implications because Russia is facing the toughest sanctions ever imposed in history. Many believe the Russian government will need to liquidate their gold reserves to remain afloat economically.

Four senators introduced the Stop Russian GOLD Act. They are, Angus King (I-Maine), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Maggie Hassan (D-N.H).  The bill takes aim at the roughly $132 billion held in gold by Russia. The goal is to dramatically limit the number of people able to buy gold from Russia. Specifically, the bill seeks to apply secondary sanctions to any American entities that deliberately engage in any transactions with Russia’s central bank holdings or anyone attempting to transport gold out of Russia. These rules would apply to both physical and digital sales of gold.

The move would further restrict Russia from participating in the global economy. The bill would also derail a critical part of Russia’s strategy which has been long in the making. In 2014, the U.S. imposed sanctions on Russia in retaliation for their invasion of Crimea. In response, Russia increased their gold purchases. This move was likely intended to safeguard the country from the impact of those sanctions and other anticipated sanctions.

In a statement, Senator King remarked, “Russia’s massive gold supply is one of the few remaining assets that Putin can use to keep his country’s economy from falling even further.” He continued, “by sanctioning these reserves, we can further isolate Russia from the world’s economy and increase the difficulty of Putin’s increasingly-costly military campaign.”

The bill, titled, “S.3771 – Stop Russian GOLD Act of 2022” would remove one of Putin’s few remaining resources. The bill not only limits Russia’s ability to survive sanctions. The bill will also makes it difficult for Putin to maintain an occupation of Ukraine even if he is successful in taking the country.

Meanwhile, costs continue to mount as Russia continues their military offensive. A study from the Centre for Economic Recovery, CIVTTA and EasyBusiness concluded that the daily cost of the war for Russia is approximately $20 billion. An inability to liquidate their gold reserves will make meeting this cost difficult.

These moves have renewed interest in gold among investors who increasingly see the metal as a reliable store of value during global turmoil. In the last six months gold, has appreciated in value by approximately 8.7% while the S&P 500 has only grown by approximately 2.1% over the same period. Moreover, the S&P 500 is down more than 6% year-to-date.

As the war continues to devastate Ukraine, it is clear that gold will become an increasingly important part of the global financial system as other asset classes waiver amid uncertainty.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

“Pikes Peak or Bust!” This Coin Captures Heart of Colorado’s Rich Gold Rush History

Posted on

After the panic of 1857, many Americans eyed the West as an opportunity to achieve financial security. In 1858, the Colorado Gold Rush began with over 100,000 people Obverse and reverse of the 1861 $10 piece.flocking to the Rocky Mountain region.

“Pikes Peak or Bust” was a common refrain among the early prospectors, in reference to the imposing mountain in the Colorado Front Range.

In the early days of the Colorado Gold Rush, money was scarce. The prospectors paid merchants for goods they needed with a pinch of gold dust from their pouch. The “pinch” was intended to equal $1 of gold and weigh 0.05 troy ounce. However, merchants with fat fingers captured bigger pinches of gold and prospectors were left with smaller wealth.

The need for standardization of money was clear – and this opened the door for the creation of private or “territorial” gold. Enterprising businessmen partnered to open private mints that turned the gold dust into usable and standard-sized gold coins.

These early private minters assayed and refined the gold dust, cast and rolled it to a certain thickness then cut the gold into round blanks. And, then machine-pressed them into gold coins for their customers.

Clark, Gruber & Co. was the first and most well-respected mint in Colorado during this time period. During the firm’s first three years of existence, they minted a reported $594,305 worth of Pikes Peak gold.

Eventually, the United States Mint acquired Clark, Gruber & Co. and it became the Denver Mint.

Clark, Gruber & Co. minted $2 1/2, $5, $10 and $20 gold coins.

The 1860 version of the $10 gold coin featured an amateurish representation of Pikes Peak. The 1861 coin was upgraded to appear similar to the Liberty Head federal gold coins in existence at that time, with the addition of PIKES PEAK on her coronet.

See the 1861 $10 piece here.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

The Enduring Appeal of the 1862-S Seated Liberty Dime

Posted on 2 Comments

The Seated Liberty images were one of the most enduring in the history of US coinage. This design appeared on the half dime, dime, quarter, and half dollar between 1836 and Obverse and reverse image of the 1862-S Seated Liberty Dime.1891. The Seated Liberty image also appeared on the silver dollar from 1836 to 1873.

The design was the work of Mint engraver Christian Gobrecht. He served as the third Chief Engraver from 1840 to 1844. His engraving work started before he was employed by the Mint. Originally, he engraved ornamental clocks. He was a pioneer in his field and invented a medal ruling machine which reproduces relief on smooth surfaces in 1810. He also improved upon the camera lucida, the pump organ, and even a talking doll.

Gobrecht’s first attempt to become chief engraver of the Mint was unsuccessful. He wrote to President James Monroe requesting the position but was denied. Eventually he was appointed “Second Engraver” in September of 1835 after the Chief Engraver, William Kneass suffered a stroke. Five years later Kneass passed away and Gobrecht was appointed Chief Engraver.

His Seated Liberty designs for which he is remembered were based on sketches by portrait painter Thomas Sully and ornithologist Titian Peale.

The obverse of the 1862-S Seated Liberty half dimes and dimes show the figure of Liberty in a flowing dress seated upon a rock. In one hand she is grasping a Liberty pole with a Phrygian cap perched on top. The cap has long been a powerful symbol of freedom and traces back to the Neoclassicism movement. The cap also represents the pursuit of liberty.

The figure has her right hand on top of a striped shield inscribed with the word “Liberty.” This feature of the design is meant to represent America’s willingness to fight for freedom. Above her is an arc of thirteen stars to represent the thirteen original colonies.

The reverse side shows the denomination, in this case reading “Half Dime.” Both the 1862 Seated Liberty half dime and dime pieces feature a wreath surrounding the denomination words.  All coins that predate 1860 include the image of laurel leaves which, like the Phrygian cap, are a Neoclassicism inspired image. By the start of 1860 the design was altered to include agricultural products including wheat and corn.

Originally, the Seated Liberty dimes and half dimes contained no stars. This design element was added in 1839.

The Seated Liberty imagery was standard on US coins ranging from half dimes to half dollars until 1879 when the Bland-Allison act significantly reduced the minting of the coins. In time, tastes changed and there was growing support for a new design. Eventually, the Barber Head design replaced the Seated Liberty.

Today, this design remains one of the most powerful images on US coins. It blends an array of images that represent freedom, patriotism, and liberty.

Gobrecht died in July of 1844 but his contribution to US coinage lived on in the Seated Liberty design.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.

How Investors Compare Gold and Silver Investments

Posted on

The precious metals sector is roaring higher in 2022 fueled by the Russian war in Ukraine, skyrocketing crude oil prices, a sinking stock market and inflation at 40-year highs.

Graph incurance growth of silver and gold bars and green arrows

As investors turn to precious metals as a portfolio risk diversifier, store of value over the long-term and a hedge against crisis – you may wonder – what’s the difference between investing in gold and silver? Before we highlight three differences, let’s take a look at the performance numbers. The precious metals sector has rocketed higher in the first quarter, while the equity market has fallen into a correction phase.

2022 Year-to-date performance

Winners

Palladium         +53%

Platinum           +15%

Silver                  +12%

Gold                   +9%

Losers

NASDAQ            -16%

S&P 500            -11%

Dow                    -9%

Data as of March 9, 2022

Gold and silver are both rewarding investors with solid returns this year, with a modest silver out-performance. While gold and silver often trade in parallel, there are differences to consider.

Liquidity and Size

The gold market is one of the most deep and liquid markets in the world and is bigger than silver. This simply means it is easy to buy and sell gold at any moment in time.  In 2019, the value of the global gold market was pegged at $24.5 trillion, bigger than the $4.4 trillion silver market, according to consulting firm CPM Group. The large size of the gold market means that major players can move large positions (buying and selling), without moving the price. For anyone trading smaller positions (and this applies to most individual investors), the liquidity isn’t an issue for either gold or silver. But, gold does take the edge in this category overall.

Volatility

In general, silver is considered to be a more volatile metal than gold. This simply means it can move faster than gold, which we’ve seen already in 2022 with silver’s out-performance. Volatility can be a double-edged sword – for short-term investors looking for quick gains – it can offer faster price appreciation. But, on the flip side, it could also erase those gains more quickly too.

Diversification

Both gold and silver bullion offer investors diversification properties – especially as they are both “hard” assets, versus “paper” assets like stocks, bonds or ETFs. However, gold again has the slight edge here over silver, as the latter is more connected to the business cycle. In addition to its value as a monetary metal, silver is widely used in manufacturing, electronic and construction. When industrial demand slows as economic growth weakens, that can tamp down demand for silver.

Meanwhile, gold is a long proven investment portfolio risk diversifier, in large part because gold has nearly zero correlation to movement in the stock market, according to a 2015 Journal of Managerial Finance research paper.

How to Measure Value

The gold/silver ratio is a time-honored method for investors to measure the relative value of these two precious metals. The ratio simply reveals the number of silver ounces needed to buy one ounce of gold. A high ratio is generally viewed as a signal that silver is undervalued relative to gold. That is what we’re seeing now.

Current Ratio: 76 oz. silver = 1 oz. gold

Historically, readings above 65 signal that silver is undervalued and is a strong buy signal for the metal. Silver continues to offer a great value to investors.

The Bottom Line

Gold recently scaled the $2,000 level, touching a new all-time high at $2,051 an ounce. Silver trades above $26 an ounce. Both precious metals are in a strong bull market cycle and offer opportunity for investors to protect and preserve their wealth. If you are exploring adding more protection to your portfolio, consider acting now before prices move even higher.

Want to read more? Subscribe to the Blanchard Newsletter and get our tales from the vault, our favorite stories from around the world and the latest tangible assets news delivered to your inbox weekly.